|
DRAFT
Humboldt County Airport
Advisory Committee
Minutes for September 24, 2002 at 7:00 PM
Dave Zebo Conference Room
1.0 Call to order
1.1 Chairman Limmer called the
meeting to order at 1909.
2.0 Roll Call
2.1 Members present: Jack Limmer,
George Jutila, Al Castaldi, Richard Fenton, Kyle Gable, Chuck
Goodwin, Arthur Hooven, Alistair McCrone, Anthony Howard
2.2 Public Employees in
attendance: Dan Horton
2.3 Guests: None
3.0 Adjustments to Calendar: None
4.0 Minutes of the meeting of August
27, 2002 were reviewed and approved.
5.0 Consent Calendar-Written Reports:
None.
6.0 Old Business
6.1 Written reports or oral
updates:
6.11 The committee’s letter
to the Board of Supervisors regarding concerns over lack of
communication between County departments was signed and
delivered recently. The letter generated a phone call to the
chairman from Alan Campbell, Director of Public Works, and a
reply to the committee is expected this week or next. It was
further discussed that the "duck ponds" currently
being constructed by Calif. Dept of Fish and Game are part of
a 10-year master plan and are a restoration of existing or
historical ponds. They are being constructed, per Karen
Kovacs, under a coastal permit previously issued through the
County Planning Department. This was noted by the committee as
another example of poor interdepartmental communication due to
lack of notice to the Aviation Division from the county
Planning Department.
6.2 Dan Horton reported that
Shutt Moen will schedule public meetings regarding ACV runway
extension options of 600’, 1200’, or 1800’ as soon as the
FAA’s review letter of the options is actually received. It was
reported that the FAA’s letter will state that extending the
runway using any of the options will not increase landing minimums
at ACV.
6.3 Kneeland Airport: Public
meetings regarding the airport improvements are to be scheduled at
a future date. Shutt-Moen was given "due dates" recently
by the County Department of Public Works for this and other master
plan work products.
6.4 Deer fencing at the
Arcata-Eureka Airport: Non-metallic fencing will be approved by
the FAA for the bluff area that has been the subject of recent
disagreement. Dan Horton reported that a newer style of
"A-frame" fencing may be promising for future fencing at
Murray and Rohnerville airports, due to lower required fence
heights and reduced costs. This fencing type has also been noted
to be effective in controlling deer incursions onto airport
properties even though it is only four feet high.
6.5 Airport Security: TSA team is
to be here in early October to plan implementation of additional
security measures for checked baggage screening at United and
Horizon gates. These measures may reduce available terminal
seating and will impact carrier’s passenger loading capacity. It
was announced that TSA will not fund any physical plant expansion
at this airport and that they may require funding from County
sources in order to implement these changes and continue air
carrier operations.
6.6 Control tower for the
Eureka-Arcata Airport: The FAA is unsure of any funding
availability for installing or operating a control tower at AVC.
6.7 Any installation of Super
Unicoms at Murray Field and the Rohnerville Airport are on hold
pending approval and political issues at the equipment
manufacturing level.
6.8 New GA ramp at ACV: The
County Board of Supervisors has accepted an FAA grant of $1.5
million for development of a new GA ramp off of Central Avenue,
including a $400,000 smart card access system.
7.0 New Business
7.1 Dan Horton noted that the
possible introduction of 70 passenger planes may cause ACV to be
changed to a level IV category airport from it’s current
designation as a level III category airport. This will increase
security requirements for air carrier operations.
7.2 Discussion was held regarding
the effect of indeterminate TSA unfunded security mandates and their
possible effects upon air travel in Humboldt County and at other
small airports. The committee would like to explore how we could or
should help to publicize these issues to the Board or to the public.
Further discussion was held regarding the uncertainty of the
committee’s mandate/authority since we serve at the pleasure of
the Board of Supervisors, and are "advisory" to them in
nature. It was decided that we need a firm idea of the committee’s
intended mandate and that we may need to dedicate a separate meeting
to discussing ways to inform the Board of Supervisors of our
concerns regarding the future health of aviation in Humboldt County.
7.3 A motion was made by George
Jutila and seconded by Alistair McCrone to "dedicate the next
regular meeting to the fullest extent to the development of our
committee’s position regarding the impediments to aviation in
Humboldt County represented by upcoming unfunded TSA security
mandates". The motion was unanimously approved.
8.0 Public Comments: None received.
9.0 Date and place of next meeting:
October 22, 2002 at the Dave Zebo Conference Room at 7:00 PM
9.0 Chairman Limmer adjourned the
meeting at 2053.
|